Intake and classification
You send URLs. We don't need your life story yet — we need the links, where they rank, and whether you've already tried reporting them. Each URL gets tagged: platform policy, copyright, defamation, privacy, or search-only.
Classification drives pricing and timeline. A single Google review dispute is a different engagement than a Ripoff Report arbitration plus six mirror sites.
Evidence and filing
We build platform-specific evidence packages. Yelp wants different documentation than Reddit or a news publisher. Copy-paste disputes fail. We've tracked a 4x higher success rate when filings cite the exact policy clause with attached proof.
Legal escalation sits parallel, not first. Counsel letters and court orders are expensive levers — we deploy them when platform channels exhaust, not as a default opening move.
Monitoring and handoff
Removal isn't the last day. Content respawns — new accounts, archive sites, scraped copies. Serious engagements include 30–90 day monitoring with re-filing authority if content reappears.
Compare providers on process transparency, not promises. Our negative content removal services breakdown lists platforms, methods, and what we won't take on — because saying no upfront saves everyone time.